The authors who sued ChatGPT and its parent company OpenAI filed the document on Friday. intervene In some cases new york times made to oppose A case in New York court pits a generative AI company and its financier Microsoft.
Authors include: hut at the end of the world In addition to California Incident author Paul Tremblay, many other celebrities participated, including Ta-Nehisi Coates, Junot Díaz, Michael Chabon, and Sarah Silverman.what they brought Case It is suing OpenAI in a potential class action lawsuit for copyright infringement. The authors claim that OpenAI’s generative AI tool ChatGPT was trained without their permission using their copyrighted book.
By “intervening”, the authors basically what to say They argued that they had a right to be involved in the case because they claimed to have a personal stake in it. In their submission they ask: times The lawsuits will either be dismissed because they are substantially similar or, if not, removed from the New York courts and consolidated with the respective lawsuits.
The authors refer to many of the other lawsuits filed against OpenAI as “copycat” lawsuits, saying many of the claims are similar. According to the intervening authors, OpenAI trying to They “forum shop” lawsuits to create conflicting judgments in different jurisdictions, paving the way for litigation to be resolved in the hopes that the consolidated litigation will have a stronger impact.
Most of their lawsuits were dismissed by California courts several weeks ago. report The Verge includes claims of unjust enrichment, DMCA violations, and negligence.
The California lawsuit already consolidates lawsuits against OpenAI by multiple authors and is part of a slew of legal claims being brought against AI companies that make generative tools. Image generation company Midjourney is also being sued by artists who say the company trained its tools to suit their art.
of new york times” claims Microsoft. invested It reportedly invested $13 billion in OpenAI and illegally used the paper’s journalism to train its models. As a result, the Times claimed, the company’s “ability to provide its services” was threatened.of times It claimed that during the ChatGPT training process, additional weighting was given to content generated by OpenAI. It’s proof that OpenAI recognizes the value of its work, the company said. It also alleged that OpenAI generated false information and attributed it to the paper, damaging its reputation.
microsoft claimed On Monday, it opposed the authors’ motion to intervene. times The lawsuit said the attempt to intervene was a “game of position” by lawyers who wanted to argue in a class action lawsuit. Microsoft’s lawyers said: timesLawyers had agreed to an expedited timeline and that they would have to start over if they were forced to go to California state court.
“Microsoft is working to defend the New York case (the only copyright infringement case pending against it) as soon as possible to justify its position that its generative AI technology does not constitute copyright infringement. ” wrote Microsoft’s lawyers, who expect the trial to begin by early next year. Year.
“AI machine learning models are legal, like many other new technologies introduced over the years, including printing presses, player pianos, personal computers, mimeographs and photocopiers, VCRs, DVRs, and search engines. technology,” Microsoft’s lawyer said. , “Because such models make fair use of copyrighted material.”
On the other hand, OpenAI and its related companies submitted the documents In the evening, he said he had no position on the motion to intervene.
We crawl the web for you so you don’t have to.
Sign up for the Daily Dot newsletter to get the best and worst of the internet delivered to your inbox every day.
*First published: February 26, 2024 at 4:49pm CST
Marlon Ettinger
Marlon Ettinger writes about politics, crime, and culture. For tips and ideas please email him at marlonjettinger@gmail.com.
