In 2022, Burn and colleagues, including the two, found that they were suspected of genetic research, despite their immediate effect on patient care. Provide information to scientists’ workIncludes clinical trials. However, publishers are often Slowly withdraw the contaminated paperEven when he warns obvious fraud. We found it 97 % of 712 problem genetic research articles I confirmed that it was not corrected.
Potential solution
There is a collaboration of Kokuran policy We are under development, excluding suspicious research from medical analysis. tool Find a problematic medical exam. And the publisher has begun Share data and technology Fighting fraud, including image fraud, in them.
Technology startup also provides help. Website ArgosReleased in September 2024 ShrinkingNevada -based alert service is allowed Check the author A collaborator for withdrawal or misconduct. Berlin’s Science Council and Communication Company MorRessier offer Research and integrity tools。 Included in the paper check tool signalLondon -based research signals, and fine weather PaperMill alarm。
However, Alam acknowledges that the fight against Paper Mills will not win as long as there is a demand for the papers.
Burn said that today’s commercial publishing is part of the problem. Cleaning the literature is a vast and expensive job. “I need to monetize the correction so that the publisher is paid to work, or forget the publisher and do it myself,” she said.
Ryotan publishing has a basic bias. “I will pay them to accept the papers,” said Bod Stern, a former editor of the Journal Cell and a strategic initiative of Howard Hughes Medical Institute. , Maryland. and More than 50,000 journals In the market, Stern said that a bad paper has been shopping for a long time to find a house.
To prevent this, you can stop paying magazines to accept the dissertation, and you can consider them as a public interest business that helps a greater profit. “You should pay for the transparent and strict quality control mechanism,” he said.
On the other hand, Pia Review, on the other hand, said, “It should be recognized as a true academic product, like the original article.” The journal must publish all the peer review reports.
This article has been reissued conversation Under Creative Commons license. This is a condensed version. Details about how scammers around the world use paper factories to enrich themselves and harm scientific research, Full version。
Frederick Jorling The editor who contributes Retraction watch; Cyrillabbé I’m a professor of computer science Universite Grenoble Alpes (UGA);and Giyome cabanak I’m a computer science professor Institut de rechherche en innFormatique de Toulouse.
