newYou can now listen to Fox News articles.
Early in Genesis, God has the important task of creating the world. He could have breathed, winked, smiled, and done it without thinking. Instead, he creates the world in a way that simultaneously introduces one of the most important ideas in the Torah.
God created the world in nine words, “And God said” – teaches us the importance of words. If God created the world with words and we are created in his image, then we are also creating the world with words.
This theme continues in the plague scene in Exodus. The text often refers to “the word of God” and “the word of Moses,” but it could just as easily have said “God” and “Moses.” The Torah does this to impress upon us that the world is run by words, and to provide a contrast to Pharaoh, who constantly contradicted his words along the way.
People who believe climate change is an “existential threat” will refrain from having children. And that’s exactly what young people are deciding. (St. Petersburg)
The Torah later teaches that there is nothing theoretical or abstract about this. In Numbers 30, Moses delivers a message from God to the people. “If a man takes an oath to Hashem, or an oath that establishes a prohibition on himself, he shall not blaspheme his words; he shall do whatever comes out of his mouth.” A promise to act. God requires humans to do whatever He says, either by doing something (an oath) or by proving that something is true (an oath).
How Trump can pull the plug on the Paris Climate Agreement and end the treaty for good
The seriousness of this word is reflected in the Hebrew language itself. In Hebrew, they are the same word for word (Dabar) – reflects the belief that words, while free and easy to use, are just as real and powerful as physical objects.
Fast forward to present day. In his 2023 State of the Union address, President Biden called the “climate crisis” an “existential threat.” This is as powerful and urgent as the set of words a person can use. Of course, an “existential threat” is a threat to our very existence.
The urgent audacity of this declaration is not unusual. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, Secretary of State John Kerry, Vice Presidents Al Gore and Kamala Harris, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, and countless others are all using the same words and saying the same thing. .
Climate change extremists are afraid to discuss it. Maybe that’s how it should be
But no one believed them.
How do we know? Each of us knows how to respond to a real “existential threat”. People who believe they will die if they don’t take medicine take medicine. If someone believes that his child is in danger, he will drop everything and rush to her. If someone believed a hurricane was coming, they would board up their house and leave town.
Anyone who responds to what they truly believe is an existential threat will personally do something important, rather than just talking about it or telling others what to do. .
The aforementioned leaders who talk about climate change as an “existential threat” appear to be doing nothing to act accordingly. They expend enormous amounts of energy at home, fly privately, and eat meat.
Climate change madness has a new target, more shocking than ever
Older generations who claim climate change is an “existential threat” may not take their words seriously.
Fast forward to their children’s generation. “There is no question that the climate crisis is the existential threat of our time,” declares House Democratic Representative Kathleen Clark. In 2022, she told NBC about her child waking up having nightmares about climate change. There is nothing wrong with her child.
In 2021, Lancet Planetary Health published the results of a study of 10,000 people aged 16 to 25 around the world. The study found that 59% of young people are “very or extremely” concerned about the climate, and 45% of young people feel uncomfortable about climate change to the extent that it affects their “daily life and livelihood.” It turns out.
For more FOX News opinions, click here
It’s not just their “everyday life.” A 2017 study widely reported by Environmental Research Letters measured the increase in carbon emissions caused by various activities. Individuals reduce their carbon footprint by 0.25 tonnes by washing their clothes in warm water, by becoming a vegetarian by 0.82 tonnes, by not driving a car by 2.4 tonnes, and by not having more children by 58.6 tonnes. can be reduced.
A Morgan Stanley report concludes that “having children is seven times more harmful to the climate in terms of annual CO2 emissions than the following 10 most-discussed mitigation actions that individuals can take.” .
The logic is clear. Those who take the word seriously, those who believe that climate change is an “existential threat,” will refrain from having children. And that’s exactly what young people are deciding.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
According to a Lancet survey, 36% of young people are “hesitant about having children” because of climate change. This data is reflected in a report from Morgan Stanley, which states that “the growing movement not to have children due to concerns about climate change is impacting fertility rates faster than any previous trend in the area of fertility decline.” “We are giving.”
In other words, the law is completely correct regarding words. You can use them disingenuously, but in the end you will reveal their very important essence. Those who declare the climate an “existential crisis” and carry on with business as usual may very well be parents to “extreme crisis” themselves. “An insecure child who won’t give me grandchildren.
For more information on Mark Garson, click here
