All defendants denied Gibson’s plaintiffs and defended the claim.
Gibson’s lawsuit was submitted only a few hours later after JU’s JU in the real estate industry was responsible for artificially expanding the real estate agent’s commission. It mainly reflects the claims made in the original committee’s lawsuit.
However, the scope of the lawsuit said, “Everyone who has been listed on multiple listing services in the United States paid the buyer using a listing agent or broker belonging to one of the broker defendants. The Broker Committee from October 31 to the present.
In the filing, BHE, a subsidiary of Warlenba Fett Berkshireha Saway, denied the claim of the plaintiffs that violated the Federal Anti -Trust Law.
“BHE denies that or have an anti -competitive or anti -competitive effect or involvement or involved.
Applications made by other defendants include similar denials, but things were slightly different in various defense they provided.
Most of the application claims that the plaintiff lacks the right to sue, claims that the class members need to arbitrate claims based on the signing individual contract, and that the plaintiff did not maintain the damage caused by the defendant. did. In addition, they stated that claims were banned by the laws of restrictions, and the plaintiffs agreed to the defendant’s petition, and that the actions of the lawsuit were “competitive.”
Hannah Holdings and Crai -Like claimed it National Real Estate Association (NAR) Committee Litigation Agreement prohibits plaintiffs’ claims. Crye-Leike claims that it is a “released party” under the settlement, and Hanna Holdings claims that Gibson’s plaintiff’s claim has been released as part of its reconciliation.
Hanna Holdings has previously been rejected from another committee lawsuit in Pennsylvania.