newYou can now listen to Fox News articles.
Recently, the White House decided that appointing an unqualified, politicized leader would be the best way to tackle the complex issue of AI regulation. Kamala Harris, now AI emperor, will probably lead America into a very dark future. The state must rectify this blunder before it is too late.
We can only solve problems by asking the right questions, which Mr. Harris and his polarized Congress clearly cannot. The U.S. needs to replace her with an impartial panel of experts that can fully develop effective AI regulations. It also needs to shield her future decision-making from the current toxic partisan environment.
Unless you’ve been in a tight spot, every newsfeed and broadcast explains how important it is for us to control AI. Therefore, you would expect the White House to adopt an all-out approach to prevent human extinction.
Biden says artificial intelligence scientists worry technology will overtake human thinking and planning
Instead, they are asking the public about accountability measures, pouring $140 million into research, development and budget proposals, and making symbolic appointments tainted with incompetence and political motives.
She was never a good choice to become AI Emperor, regardless of whether the Vice President was right for her current job. Her knowledge of vast, almost uncontrollable technology is minimal. Former and current presidential staffers have called her a bully and have reported an unhealthy environment in the White House where she is. We also know she failed to remedy the Southern Border Crisis.
Harris is not only an uneducated AI regulator, but an unsuitable leader for high-stakes outcomes. In parallel, an impartial survey of recent congressional hearings by the CEO of Open AI (creator of ChatGPT) and the CEO of TikTok found that our representatives lacked knowledge of what was at stake. It became clear that there is It creates a no-win situation between decision makers in both executive and legislative branches.
Congress and Harris, fueled by their own political agendas, are hampered by their failure to understand the implications for AI well beyond privacy protections, and are unlikely to formulate any future solutions. right.
The only way we can find the right solutions is through an impartial panel of experts across legal, social, economic and technical instruments. This group must delve into and understand how AI will impact our national and personal security, as well as unprecedented economic opportunities.
They need to explore the real dangers of AI, unlike the newly released AI Risk Management Framework and AI Bill of Rights blueprints that cling to privacy and discrimination issues.
An independent “Commissioner Warren” like an unbiased, non-political leader should lead a panel of experts with a broad understanding of AI applications and their social and economic integration to help develop effective policies. A meeting must be appointed. Not an expert panel made up of Microsoft, Google, OpenAI, and other usual suspects with significant financial interests.
AI regulation is a pervasive issue that transcends borders. We need a strong group of critical thinkers because our mistakes in the US and elsewhere will affect more people. Business educator Marshall Goldsmith’s wise words are very applicable to our current predicament. What led us here doesn’t lead us there. Selfish concerns and prioritization of privacy and budgets will not result in streamlined AI regulation.
Biden and Harris meet with big tech CEOs, Altman testifies before Congress, shows of political politics and public appeasement, AI will destroy the world as we know it does not reduce the possibility of
This is why we need an independent commission that balances the importance of individual privacy with identifying dangerous actors. We need a police system to classify and define suspicious signals. To keep malicious actors out, ordinary people and AI providers must also give up some of their privacy. Otherwise, this exciting technology could be repurposed as a weapon of mass destruction.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE OPINIONS NEWSLETTER
Stop political nonsense and showing off at meaningless meetings. Let’s put politics above logic and not endanger national security and humanity. It’s a great speech, and it’s true that companies have an ethical, legal, and moral responsibility to keep their AI safe.
It’s also true that harmful technologies can come from well-intentioned companies. However, the impact of AI is very different from other global threats we have faced so far, such as nuclear extinction. Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger believes that tensions between the United States and China emulate those of the Cold War era, but with a much higher chance of catastrophe.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Foreign adversaries could use AI to develop weapons that are more lethal than previous nuclear threats. The laws and policies that are needed now are not limited to those that govern countries and large corporations. This threat can come from a few smart people with computers anywhere in the world.
Laws and policies must include social change as well as severe penalties. To properly protect the world, regulation must be separated from political beliefs, and we must go beyond our comfort zone for the good of mankind.
Click here to read more about Sid Mohaseb