Getty Images
Less than 24 hours after Angelina Jolie’s lawyers filed their motion, Brad Pitt’s lawyers have filed their own motion.
In Mr. Pitt’s motion, his lawyers are asking Mr. Jolie to disclose other NDAs he has entered into with other third parties, including his staff.
In documents obtained by Extra, Pitt’s attorney John Berlinsky said: “If Jolie made it a condition of an individual’s continued employment that the individual agree to a non-disclosure agreement covering what she witnessed in her home, including the treatment of her children and Pitt, Pitt would As to whether she truly believed that the provision she made was an “unconscionable gag order,” the evidence would be very strong. The same goes for non-disclosure agreements between Jolie and third parties with whom she has relationships or who help care for the couple’s children. ”
“Insofar as Jolie requested silence from this third party about her family and home life, especially in the absence of a legitimate business reason, Pitt’s requested confidentiality related to Miraval’s business “It will speak volumes about whether Jolie actually thought the deal was a deal-breaker, and then she claimed it was a deal-maker,” Berlinski continued.
“The scope, terms, and subject matter covered by the NDA that Jolie signed or had a third party sign are not truly clear from her negotiations with Pitt because of the NDA that Jolie requested, as Jolie alleges.” That would be evidence of whether or not she backed out. Just as an example, if Jolie required others to sign an NDA that is at least as broad as the NDA she claims is highly “unconscionable” here. , which would greatly undermine her purported excuse to break off negotiations with Pitt and negotiate secretly with Story. Furthermore, the existence of these documents is not speculative,” the papers said. “Jolie has categorically refused to produce a number of other NDAs and related documents that she signed or requested from others during the relevant period, presumably because she knew they would materially undermine her defense. Probably because it is.”
In a court filing for Jolie on Thursday, her lawyers said Pitt had been abusive toward her even before the infamous 2016 plane crash that sparked their breakup. he claimed.
![](https://extra-images.akamaized.net/image/b0/5by4/2021/05/04/b00fb0eb8e8c4105b2eed29042081a69_xs.jpg)
Getty Images
Angelia Jolie’s legal team makes new abuse claims about Brad Pitt
See story
Amid legal battle over French winery Château Miraval, correspondence is released proving that Jolie “will not allow Pitt to sell his interest in the winery to Pitt until he signs a more onerous agreement” A lawsuit was filed asking for. ” and an “extensive” NDA.
The newspaper said, “Pitt’s history of physical abuse against Jolie began long before the family flew from France to Los Angeles in September 2016, which marked the first time he physically abused the children.” Jolie then left him immediately.”
No charges were brought against Pitt, and he denied any abuse.
Pitt’s close friends are also involved in the drama.
The friend said, “This lawsuit is not about what happened on the plane in 2016. The issue is whether there was an agreement not to sell ownership of the winery and the family home without the other party’s consent.” That’s what Brad and his team are focused on, and so far the legal momentum is on their side. ”
“The non-disclosure agreement Jolie was asked to sign is a standard business agreement designed to protect the asset being sold, in this case her stake in Chateau Miraval,” the source said. . “It is unclear why she considers this unconscionable when just a few months later her own lawyer proposed a mutually binding gag clause as part of her divorce.”